mpc:
2
further tightening in credit conditions over the past quarter in the Federal Reserve Senior Officer
Loan Survey.
5
Since early June, credit spreads for lower-rated borrowers had widened sharply in the United
States. Staff analysis suggested that this might reflect firm-specific or sectoral factors rather than
broader influences; sharp increases in spreads had been more prevalent in the communications and
technology, and electronic, sectors. A differentiated pattern of this sort was typical of a period of
rapid structural change, in which some firms were `winners' and others lost out, resulting in spreads
increasing on average. But spreads would also widen in a general economic downturn, with the risk
of default increasing for financially weaker companies. If confidence fell sharply while spreads were
increasing, the `soft landing' might prove rather bumpy.
6
Computers, communications equipment and semiconductors continued to account for most of
the increase in US manufacturing output. Orders data, however, suggested a deceleration in demand
might be in prospect, raising the possibility of future overcapacity in these sectors. Equity prices for
such companies had also moved sharply. While the NASDAQ index was still higher than it had been
for most of 1999, it had fallen 45% since mid-March 2000. This might have implications for other
parts of the US economy, both via confidence and wealth effects. That said, expectations of growth
in earnings per share remained quite strong, at around 8% for the next year according to the recent
Merrill Lynch survey of fund managers.
7
While movements in the NASDAQ index would not of themselves generate significant wealth
effects, this was not the case for equity markets taken as a whole. Indeed, the previous rise in equity
prices might well explain part of the fall in the US saving ratio. Now that wealth was no longer
rising as a result of increasing equity prices, this might lead (once the lags had worked through) to a
greater propensity to save out of current income. And if market participants revised down their
estimates of trend productivity growth, equity prices might fall still further. It was recognised that
consensus expectations of corporate earnings growth, although currently remaining strong,
sometimes failed to signal a prospective downturn. If so, GDP growth could fall sharply, especially
if inventories were cut back. In such circumstances, however, the Federal Reserve would have scope
to adjust monetary policy accordingly, provided inflationary pressures were subdued.
Make a comment: