mpc:
9
restrained by higher market rates but the Committee then failed to raise rates, the market's view of the
Committee's reaction function would change, storing up trouble for the future.
34 The Committee agreed that it should not place great weight on expectations of what the ECB and
FOMC might do at their meetings on 4 November (the same day as the MPC's meeting) and
16 November respectively. It was noted that a clear majority of market participants expected the MPC
to raise its rate by 25 basis points, in which case a move of that size would probably not have much
effect on market prices.
35 The shape of the inflation projection had changed materially over the past year. A year ago, it had
been humped; in May and August it had had a gentle saucer shape; now inflation was projected to fall
further below the target, before rising more steeply towards the end of the forecast period. This
reflected the view that accumulating inflationary pressures would surface after a period in which
measured inflation was held back by a series of specific price level changes. In particular, after falling
back in the short run earnings growth was likely to pick up further out in the forecast period. On the
one hand, the degree of uncertainty about the outlook was considerably greater at the two year horizon,
so that the Committee could be less sure about the projected steep rise than it could be about the nearer-
term prospect of inflation remaining below target. On the other hand, monetary policy changes would
have a greater effect on inflation at around two years than on nearer-term prospects. The Committee
agreed that, other things being equal, the shape of the projection meant that, compared with a profile in
which inflation rose steadily, there was more time to tighten policy in order further to restrain demand
growth if that still proved necessary.
The immediate policy decision
36 The Committee agreed that the analysis of the outlook for inflation had changed over the past few
months. The news on demand and activity had been stronger than expected, whereas RPIX inflation
had been weaker than expected. The short-term relationship between output and prices had for some
time been uncertain, and if anything that uncertainty had increased. For a long time strong
domestically-generated inflationary pressures had been offset by strongly benign external influences:
the price and net trade effects of the rising pound and of the shocks to world activity. Those external
influences were now smaller. Sterling had recently risen slightly, but by less than during 1997 and
1998, and the world economy was recovering, with consequent rises in some input costs, for example
oil. The key issues were now on the one hand the size and persistence of various downward influences
Make a comment: